RELEASE –

Issued November 19, 2021

HMRC Riding Roughshod Over Residents With
Latest Dover Internal Border Facility Consultation

Dover & Deal Liberal Democrats have heavily criticised HMRC’s latest consultation and proposals for the newly named Dover Internal Border Facility (Dover IBF) as unacceptable and riding roughshod over local residents’ concerns.

HM Revenue & Customs recently launched a new set of proposals for a Dover IBF (originally called the White Cliffs Inland Border Facility) affording, once again a very short time period in which to respond to the consultation (October 25 to November 7, which was later extended to November 17, 2021). 

To make matters worse, as this is a “new proposal” HMRC has erased all previous comments and objections to the original site, submitted via previous consultations, showing no respect whatsoever to local residents and their concerns.

Furthermore, the latest set of proposals are very short on detail, which makes it difficult to respond/object in any meaningful way.

“It is jaw-droppingly shocking that HMRC can ride roughshod in this way over local residents.  It’s clear that no proper long-term planning is taking place.  It’s astounding.” 

Dover & Deal Lib Dems have submitted a range of objections including:

• The enormous impact the site will have on local traffic at the Duke of York, B&Q and Whitfield roundabouts, the A2, the A258 to Walmer and Deal, the A20 and rural lanes.
• The level of HGV traffic to and from the site 24/7
• The plan to permit HGVs to use the new Dover Fastrack route, which was seen partly as a green, clean initiative for buses and cyclists
• The huge negative environmental impact such a development will have. HMRC speaks of a “biodiversity net gain” but how can this be possible?

The local party raises additional questions including:

• Why is the government employing a Special Development Order (SDO), a mechanism originally designed strictly for national emergencies, to grant temporary planning permission?
• An Environmental Impact Assessment is an important element of an SDO.  Has one been undertaken and if so where are the findings?
• What green initiatives are planned as part of the development?
• How will this development enable Dover District to reach its goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2050?

Comments Penelope James, Dover & Deal Liberal Democrat party member:

“We are utterly appalled that this new consultation has meant all previous objections and comments from local residents and organisations regarding the proposed Inland Border Facility at White Cliffs Business Park have now been erased.  This is not how democracy works. 

“Furthermore, we fail to understand why a Special Development Order is being employed when the development should be subject to normal planning processes.  No technical details have been submitted, no Environmental Impact assessment, as far as we are aware, and no green initiatives proposed.

ENDS

For further information please contact:

Dover & Deal Liberal Democrats
Email: [email protected]
Tel: 07860 162231

Dover & Deal Liberal Democrats are fielding a slate of candidates across the District in the local elections on May 6.

Kent County Council:

Deal and Walmer - Penelope James

Deal and Walmer - John Gosling

Dover north - Annabel Stogdon 

Dover Town - Roben Franklin

Dover Town - Luke Lyden

Dover West - Richard Blackwell

Sandwich - Vernon Recas

Dover District Council:

Mill Hill Ward - Richard Blackwell

Deal Town Council: 

Mill Hill - Richard Blackwell 

Caring for your community, your environment and for you! 

Vote for a party that gets things done.  

NEWS RELEASE
Issued February 16, 2021

Liberal Democrat Prospective Parliamentary Candidate  Penelope James at the Guston IBF Site 

Lib Dem Peer Baroness Jenny Randerson slammed the Government over the White Cliffs International Border Facility in the House of Lords, last Thursday (11 February) during a debate on Border Facilities and Infrastructure.

Baroness Randerson asked why the Government chose to use a Special Development Order (SDO), designed strictly for emergencies, to grant temporary planning permission for the site at Whitfield/Guston. “Time and again the Government was warned by hauliers and exporters of the need for early preparation. Therefore I find the repeated pleas of urgency used in the EM completely unacceptable. The Government has had 41/2 years to prepare for Brexit.  It is no good shouting “emergency” now.” 

Baroness Randerson was shocked at how little information local residents and councillors were being given: “The residents of the neighbouring villages of Whitfield and Guston are disgusted by the way they have been treated in this process....Their rights to protest or even to know what is going on are minimal. This week Dover District Council dealt with the issue. Councillors say they were not allowed to see the application until 24 hours before the meeting, and in secret, and were not allowed to disclose details to others.” 

Baroness Randerson also highlighted the fact that, despite the selected site being in a rural location and close to an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, no Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has been undertaken for this application. (An EIA reviews the impact of a project on the environment and the measures needed to mitigate this impact).

Dover and Deal Liberal Democrats also ask why no EIA has been undertaken as the Government itself introduced a law in 2019 which specified that an SDO cannot be used for any development over 5 hectares. The site at Whitfield/Guston covers 37 hectares, which means the Government is obliged to undertake an EIA.

Furthermore, the Government is in clear breach of three conventions:

• UN’s Aarhus Convention, to which the UK is a signatory, and which allows everyone the right of access to environmental information and allows for the public to participate in environmental decision making.
• the Espoo Convention – Environmental Impact in a Transboundary Context: Article 2.2 – for Environmental Impact Assessment, which the UK signed in 1991 and ratified in 1997
• the Kiev Protocol – Strategic Environmental Assessment (to be undertaken earlier than an EIA) which provides for extensive public participation in government decision-making in numerous sectors, which the UK signed in 2003. 

Local Liberal Democrat campaigner, Penelope James, commented:

“The Government has shown its utter incompetence in the way it has handled this development. Their inability to plan ahead and be transparent with the local community defies belief. The fact that they are willing to ride rough shod over their own laws and UN conventions to which they have signed up is beyond contempt. The Conservatives insisted on pulling Britain out of the Customs Union and the Single Market so we could regain control over our laws. It seems the residents of Guston Parish have less control now than when Britain was a member of the European Union.”

ENDS

NEWS RELEASE –

Issued January 12, 2021

Dover and Deal Liberal Democrats Slam Tory Government

over new Inland Border Clearance site At Guston

Dover and Deal Liberal Democrat chair, Roben Franklin, has joined other local parties in its whole hearted opposition to the new Inland Border Clearance site for HGVs scheduled to start construction this month on agricultural land between the new Dover Leisure Centre at Whitfield and Guston Village.

Concerns have been growing since July 2020, but became a reality when residents received a letter from the under-secretary of state at the Department of Transport, Rachel Maclean MP, dated 31 December 2020, that work would start on the site this month, January 2021.

Roben Franklin comments:

“Dover and Deal Liberal Democrats are appalled at the way in which residents were informed and that a Special Development Order was implemented to allow a development like this to be enabled in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, with little or no consultation with our local council or local residents.

“After 4 long years of planning for Brexit, this is the not the kind of New Year’s present residents expected to land in their laps from our Conservative government and with no warning. Once again the Conservatives have revealed their complete incompetence, their total failure to plan ahead and their utter inability to be transparent with voters.

“To add insult to injury it is also shocking that the Government has ridden rough shod over local residents’ concerns and have refused to publish any Environmental Impact Assessment.”

Dover and Deal Liberal Democrats ask:

1. How is an Inland Border Clearance site for up to 1200n HGVs, with floodlighting, power points for refrigerated lorries and generators in use 24 hours, being allowed to happen in an AONB?
2. Why was a geographically more suitable location not selected? On a brownfield site or Calais for instance? (Le Touquet agreement covers passport controls and migrants - many of our Border control officers who live in Kent travel daily to France to undertake their jobs – but this could have been arranged for goods.)
3. Where is the rejected inbound freight going to be stored? Will new warehousing be built to accommodate it at the expense of Kent ratepayers?

Franklin continued:

“The Conservatives have insisted on pulling Britain out of the Customs Union and the Single Market and the much lauded Brexit benefits are mountains of red tape and additional taxes for which no one voted. The impact on East Kent is that we now have Customs Clearance centres and lorry parks which were not included on the side the bus, or any bus. They could have been avoided if the Government had taken a more constructive approach to Brexit. The Tories promises of prosperity and control were empty, rather we are ending up with stagnation in Dover and Guston / Whitfield residents being left without a say or any control over their rural community.”

ENDS

In order to tackle criminal gangs taking advantage of refugees, Mrs Elphicke should be moving away from the xenophobic policies the Conservatives have installed into our immigration system and instead fix properly the broken system that is the Government. In Mrs Elphicke’s question, she discusses the horrible way children are being forced to take risks to enter the UK.

If Mrs Elphicke is serious about protecting children, then she should encourage the Government to invest in a non-political body to undertake the role of processing visa applications and make decisions efficiently and with equity. Further to this, fees for registering a child as a British citizen should be reduced from £1,012 to the admin cost of £372. This is crucial not only for the safety of the child but also the integration of migrant children into British society as they age and grow accustom into Dover’s values and those of the UK. Excluding them from their Britishness will only cause isolation from society and they will fall through the safety nets established by the Government.

However, we must do more for migrants who find themselves exploited by gangs and profiteers. We should Introduce a practical, smart implementation of labour market standards with a new Worker Protection Enforcement Authority (WPEA) to protect people both in and entering the country from slavery and trafficking. The WPEA and a non-political agency are needed to fix the immigration system, as judges must reverse 52% of Home Office decisions on immigration and asylum. Mrs Elphicke, we are sure, is genuine about ensuring pregnant women and children are not exploited, but returning boats to France will only continue the cycle of exploitation and misery.

As the Liberal Democrats have set out, there are alternative options available which can mitigate the experiences migrants encounter such as Home Office incompetency and failure or exploitation by gangs. Such options would spare the coast guards and border guards from having to witness such horrific scenes and pleas from desperate souls, while at the same time save the taxpayer from having to pay for the equipment and paperwork needed to return migrants . We urge Mrs Elphicke, for all involved, to encourage the Home Secretary to reform the system for the better, rather than a continuation of the pain and suffering already being felt by refugees."

15th June 2020